*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://kenzie.writing.com/main/authors.php/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
sparkyvacdr's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Sparky
(minimum 50,000 GPs)
I like to encourage writers, while giving accurate, insightful, truthful feedback. Reviews for novel length items will be an overview and general comment. I don't review line by line or focus on grammar, spelling or punctuation -except perhaps if I see something affecting the storyline, or if I have suggestions relating to improving relevant areas of the work.
jaejaeme's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Just Jae
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have experience looking for consistency. I fully believe in Keep It Simple & Succinct. *Smile*
Preferred Author
Jellyfish-Vote Green on May 2!
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to always pick out the positive points in a piece, even if overall I am not enamoured by it. I tend to point out grammatical and spelling errors. I will be honest, but not unkind *Smile*
rennur's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Geoff
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I don't like using a template. I don't like correcting spelling. I don't like correcting grammar. I don't want to be your editor. I enjoy discussing what I have read. I am very happy to tell people what I have liked and what I have disliked. There is not a lot that I dislike.
Preferred Author
LightinMind
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
I try to be honest and positive. My Christian faith is an important background factor. I hate rating low but have a system that determines how I grade.
 
STATIC
My Philosophy of Rating and Reviewing  (E)
How do I assess people's work when reviewing?
#2259390 by LightinMind
jim-d's Portfolio!
Moderator
Sum1
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Casual for the most part. I will point out errors I see and offer suggested corrections. I like to focus on the content and formatting of the item. I love providing helpful comments and feedback that may improve the item if acted on.
Registered Author
LorenIsOneOfMyNames
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm honest but constructive. I'll explain why I give the number of stars I give and what you could do to improve that. I do fix grammar as well as look at style, emotional triggers, characters, and other things like that. I'll get back to you with a full review in a couple of days or so after the request, depending on the length of the item.
soledad_moon's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Elisa the Bunny Stik
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
In a single word, thorough. I will turn your piece upside down, shake the change out of its pockets and look at even the most minute details. I can be technical but will do so when emphasizing a larger point about the piece as a whole.
notjackson's Portfolio!
Registered Author
jackson
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am not an expert reviewer, but I have some small amount of talent in the field of writing. I will not edit your work, but typos, grammar mistakes, etc. will be pointed out if I see them. I will give you my impression of your work, encourage you, and do my best to review the work.
Preferred Author
edgework
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Unsentimental. I focus on the kinds of craft issues that will keep a writer from being taken seriously and prevent them from fully expressing their vision. For more information, see "Writing Hurts: Review Forum
Registered Author
Improxablity
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I offer praise when it is truly deserved and advice when it truly wanted.
tadpole1's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Tadpole1
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Depends. Sometimes, in depth, and sometimes, "just the feel of the item."
Preferred Author
H❀pe
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My review style is informal and encouraging of writer's development.
Registered Author
Temperance Stone
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Hi. I'm not super experienced with giving reviews so I stay away from technical stuff. I prefer short stories. I generally share what I liked and didn't like about the story. I usually give an example of what I think overall and whether or not it has grabbed my attention making me want more of the story. I hope to get more experienced so that I can be more helpful in the future
Registered Author
Cupadraig~The Remote Country
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm not sure what this means. I am honest in my review(s) and try to offer constructive advice when I find something amiss. I also enjoy pointing out what works for me in your story so you get equal positive. I want to help you get better. That's why we are here.
kingalex1234's Portfolio!
Registered Author
kingalex1234
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend to be constructive, though I've been known to be a bit too nice...at least, in my opinion. note that while I'll review anything requested, they can be a bit sloppy if I don't take interest.
spidergirl's Portfolio!
Moderator
spidey
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I attempt a well-rounded review where I look at the item from a writer's and reader's perspective. I'll tell you what I liked and what I think could be strengthened. I like to think I'm a courteous and helpful reviewer.
jotokai's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Joto-Kai
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like a review that makes me edit, even if it bothers me or offends me. So I look at your piece with, "What would I change to make this better and why?" And I write down most of what I think... the limit being how much you paid, more than how much you can handle! And of course there's no guarantee that my advice won't make it worse. Well, except the long list of bestseller credits-- oh, I haven't published them yet. But feel free to request a refund if I really like your piece. It's happened, sometimes I'm in too good of a mood and I think your work is perfect. If it was, you'd be submitting it for a royalty advance... praise is nice but it's like Chinese food, you need more in an hour. Whereas critique sticks to your ribs...
Registered Author
JaceCar
(minimum 15,000 GPs)
I'm picky when it comes to review, or shall I say not just how I review, but what I choose to review in the first place. I will make an attempt at anything if you really want me to, but there are exceptions. If something is so riddled with errors that a spell checker or basic grammar checker would find, I have a hard time reading through it. And if I can't get through it, I can't give you a good review. If I comment on grammar at all, it usually means I've identified a pattern of repeated errors, and I think I can help you fix them. That said, I look mainly for Content, Theme, Style, Continuity, Passion -- NOT line editing or grammar checking. In addition to the above, I tend to comment on what I think is missing, what can be improved, or something that I really like and want to see you keep doing it.
Preferred Author
Beholden
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a review template that is only used for in depth reviews, usually those that are specifically requested. These will be as comprehensive as I can manage, including everything I have noticed in reading the piece. Most of my reviews, however, are more in the nature of reactions to the piece with brief notes on things I find particularly good and suggestions on dealing with any obvious flaws in the writing.
Printed from https://kenzie.writing.com/main/authors.php/action/reviewers